
"Jim Garrigues"
I have a suggestion for the proof that girls = evil.
I believe that when you say:
x = (sqrt(y))^2
that you can only say that
x = |y| (absolute value of y)
therefore,
if girls=(sqrt(evil))^2
then girls=|evil|
or girls are "absolute" evil!
-Jim
Dave Jepson on October 11, 2005 at 03:59
I have a comment on Jim Garrigues remark.
Jim says that x =
(sqrt(y))^2 ==> x=|y|. This is not the case. If we had x= sqrt(y^2),
then ==> x=|y|. Therefore, the original joke holds true and it is
incorrect to add the "absolute" evil to the joke.
(sqrt(y))^2 ==> x=|y|. This is not the case. If we had x= sqrt(y^2),
then ==> x=|y|. Therefore, the original joke holds true and it is
incorrect to add the "absolute" evil to the joke.
Dave Jepson on October 11, 2005 at 03:59
yeah we are evil...sorry...get used to it
alyssa on October 19, 2005 at 07:31
yeah we are evil...sorry...get used to it
alyssa on October 19, 2005 at 07:31
i agree entirely with ur theory and was wondering if u would make
another theory,this time proving teacher to b evil
another theory,this time proving teacher to b evil
craig Watts on October 23, 2005 at 02:33
i agree entirely with ur theory and was wondering if u would make
another theory,this time proving teacher to b evil
another theory,this time proving teacher to b evil
craig Watts on October 23, 2005 at 02:33
I SUCK AT MATH
barney on November 08, 2005 at 07:14
I SUCK AT MATH
barney on November 08, 2005 at 07:14
This made a better end to a maths lesson than usual! Cheers. Though I
think its sad what our teacher gets up to in his spare time. Agree
with Craig Watts!!!
think its sad what our teacher gets up to in his spare time. Agree
with Craig Watts!!!
Jez on November 29, 2005 at 07:39
This made a better end to a maths lesson than usual! Cheers. Though I
think its sad what our teacher gets up to in his spare time. Agree
with Craig Watts!!!
think its sad what our teacher gets up to in his spare time. Agree
with Craig Watts!!!
Jez on November 29, 2005 at 07:39
ahem...i have to say that it is the LOVE of money that is evil, not
money itself. therefore, girls = not evil. =P
money itself. therefore, girls = not evil. =P
baboon on December 01, 2005 at 06:17
err...
girls = time and money
---------------------
isnt that
time + money? not time x money eg. 3 and 5 is 8 not 15
time + money? not time x money eg. 3 and 5 is 8 not 15
andrew on December 07, 2005 at 08:10
you guys are nerds
duck on December 15, 2005 at 03:30
There is nothing wrong with this because I would spend all my time
with her but not all my money on her lol
with her but not all my money on her lol
Spikey on December 16, 2005 at 07:01
u people who r agruing against its logic r missing the point in this.
it was made for a joke, and its a good one. so dont try and b smart
asses and try to dispove it, leave it.
it was made for a joke, and its a good one. so dont try and b smart
asses and try to dispove it, leave it.
Sam on December 16, 2005 at 08:27
ya i think that you are all nerds that cant get girls anyways so you
are all making up excuses
are all making up excuses
poop on December 31, 2005 at 06:37
You can also substitute girl with games, fun, good, ect.
Thus you
can conclude that: girls = evil = porn = games = fun = time *
money scary but true :D
can conclude that: girls = evil = porn = games = fun = time *
money scary but true :D
MKCCK on December 31, 2005 at 08:18
Nitpicking is the route to the nerd side, it is a bloody joke, leave
it alone, mathimatics have no place in comedy
it alone, mathimatics have no place in comedy
Nik on January 02, 2006 at 05:28
Nitpicking is the route to the nerd side, it is a bloody joke, leave
it alone, mathimatics have no place in comedy
it alone, mathimatics have no place in comedy
Nik on January 02, 2006 at 05:30
damn double posting... and for anyone who comments after me - i do
know that its spelt mathEmatics *grumbles about lack of editing
ability*
know that its spelt mathEmatics *grumbles about lack of editing
ability*
Nik on January 02, 2006 at 05:31
To give an answer to andrew about the girls = time and money would be
time + money not time x money. When I originally thought of this
proof about 6 years ago I had it as girls are the product of time and
money meaning u can only get a girl if u spend both time and money.
grils = time x money
time + money not time x money. When I originally thought of this
proof about 6 years ago I had it as girls are the product of time and
money meaning u can only get a girl if u spend both time and money.
grils = time x money
Chris on January 08, 2006 at 03:26
Beware: I am girl! Guys who think this way cannot afford us!
LoveDanger on January 13, 2006 at 01:46
You are all nerds trying to make excuses for tou lacking abilities in
love :-) HAHA
love :-) HAHA
Dr_McCoy on January 14, 2006 at 08:41
grep
bill on January 21, 2006 at 04:23
lol time x monmey is correct, more time, more money!
mike on October 18, 2006 at 12:44
No dout with this proof at all.
Kibrab on October 23, 2006 at 06:24
Girls ARE evil - and should be treated as such. Sorry girls, go ahead
and hate me, but you are biologically, and mathematically, proven to
be evil. Frauen sind Schweine, glaube mir mein Sohn, sie wollen
alle nur dein Geld, das ist das einzige was zählt. Frauen sind
Schweine, manchmal sind sie sogar nett, aber dann wollen sie mit dir
nur ins Bett.
and hate me, but you are biologically, and mathematically, proven to
be evil. Frauen sind Schweine, glaube mir mein Sohn, sie wollen
alle nur dein Geld, das ist das einzige was zählt. Frauen sind
Schweine, manchmal sind sie sogar nett, aber dann wollen sie mit dir
nur ins Bett.
reality on October 30, 2006 at 12:07
all those fools who post comments such as "ooh you only say those
things because you can't get girls anyway" are the biggest idiots i've
seen. It's a joke for all you retards who don't understand, not an
excuse.
things because you can't get girls anyway" are the biggest idiots i've
seen. It's a joke for all you retards who don't understand, not an
excuse.
vogley on November 19, 2006 at 05:12
agree with vogley, those who think this is for nerds who cant get
girls are too dumb to get a girl anyhow
girls are too dumb to get a girl anyhow
XD on November 22, 2006 at 08:38
escalation is never far away when a weapon is brandished.
[love of]
money may be the root of all evil, but which root? Why assume the
square root? It might require a "higher power" before real evil is
attained. ; )
money may be the root of all evil, but which root? Why assume the
square root? It might require a "higher power" before real evil is
attained. ; )
slippery slope on November 27, 2006 at 10:47
I have a few suggestions on this proof... Agreed that they aren't
"absolutle" evil, but i can say with confidence that they are always
"positively" evil... And also feel some thing got left out. When the
proof says that money is the root of all evil, then it should be a
sumation of evil, and if my math serves me right, then the final
answer would be that girls = positivly the sum of all evil...
"absolutle" evil, but i can say with confidence that they are always
"positively" evil... And also feel some thing got left out. When the
proof says that money is the root of all evil, then it should be a
sumation of evil, and if my math serves me right, then the final
answer would be that girls = positivly the sum of all evil...
Jader on November 27, 2006 at 02:03
Whats with the Deutsch?
Horatio on December 11, 2006 at 05:15
An alternative to handling the "money is the root of _all_ evil" case
is to simply include it (use of the upside-down a from predicate
calculus is acceptable): Money = sqrt(all evil). Girls = sqrt(all
evil)^2. Girls = all evil. Girls/all = evil. I.e., girls, overall,
are evil.
is to simply include it (use of the upside-down a from predicate
calculus is acceptable): Money = sqrt(all evil). Girls = sqrt(all
evil)^2. Girls = all evil. Girls/all = evil. I.e., girls, overall,
are evil.
Luke on December 12, 2006 at 04:36
This is mathematically incorrect. Girls require time AND money. And is
an additive statement. Girls=money + time, girls=money+money=2money,
girl=2(sqrt evil) but not evil.
an additive statement. Girls=money + time, girls=money+money=2money,
girl=2(sqrt evil) but not evil.
Rose on December 17, 2006 at 08:22
well it doesnt accually stat that then and is addition because when
you think about multipiling things you say 5 and 3 is 15 so it can
swing either way :)
you think about multipiling things you say 5 and 3 is 15 so it can
swing either way :)
Jaime on December 18, 2006 at 05:58
Well, multiplication is the conjunction in boolean algebra, so it just
depends on which mathematical algebra or language we are talking
about. In boolean algebra money + time means money OR time. But I
guess boolean algebra does not include square roots and such. Don't
know, don't care. Classical joke anywho.
depends on which mathematical algebra or language we are talking
about. In boolean algebra money + time means money OR time. But I
guess boolean algebra does not include square roots and such. Don't
know, don't care. Classical joke anywho.
Frenia on December 18, 2006 at 07:32
Lol...random much?
But guys..you must love the fact we are evil cause
youd be pretty damn miserable...and gay..without us =P We love you
too haha
youd be pretty damn miserable...and gay..without us =P We love you
too haha
Danneh&&Kaitii on January 02, 2007 at 12:31
"Money is the root of all evil" is actually a misquote. The actual
quote is "radix omnium malorum est cupiditas," which means that the
LOVE of money is the root of all evil. Therefore, this doesn't work.
Not to mention the error in "time and money" not equalling "time x
money." ;) -Peace
quote is "radix omnium malorum est cupiditas," which means that the
LOVE of money is the root of all evil. Therefore, this doesn't work.
Not to mention the error in "time and money" not equalling "time x
money." ;) -Peace
WellActually on January 05, 2007 at 08:49
pretty funny but you ppl who decide to criticize a funny joke are
queers
queers
RJ SquatBottoms on January 06, 2007 at 03:30
I liked the proof. I too always suspected time + money, but think
about it: girls are the product of time and money, not just time and
money put together. I'm just quoting from an earlier post, btw. Look
at Chris's post above.
about it: girls are the product of time and money, not just time and
money put together. I'm just quoting from an earlier post, btw. Look
at Chris's post above.
Pete on January 08, 2007 at 04:21
u guys really are nerds
z on January 13, 2007 at 07:14
wow. im a jewish faggot
That Jewish faggot on January 14, 2007 at 08:05
NERD!!!
mario on January 23, 2007 at 08:47
uh, i dont get it...
Buisness Major on January 23, 2007 at 04:18
i hate u all go die in a hole ps girls are hot!!!!
i hate u on February 01, 2007 at 01:01
so what were evil, were still hot!!!
missy on February 01, 2007 at 11:36
IN TECHNICOLOR!!!
tinkerbell on February 01, 2007 at 11:36
man im like fuckin devils everyday
Dream Bagels on February 12, 2007 at 06:20
There is an error at the very beginning of the proof. "And" implies
addition, not multiplication.
addition, not multiplication.
Brandon on February 14, 2007 at 11:45
that's so GAY!!! if we r so evil then y do guys want 2 fuck us, screw
us, &have there way w/ us? well..if u can't firgure that out
then..SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
us, &have there way w/ us? well..if u can't firgure that out
then..SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
marcy on February 24, 2007 at 12:31
I'm a man and I need time and money, does that mean I'm evil? NO. SOME
girls are evil and SOME men are evil, you can't class it on one whole
race's reputation. This is just stupid.
girls are evil and SOME men are evil, you can't class it on one whole
race's reputation. This is just stupid.
Robert on February 27, 2007 at 10:13
Ah, Robert, just a thought - there is only one human "race". Each
gender is not its own race, we kinda work together on it. Stupid is
what stupid does. Oh, and yes, you are evil.
gender is not its own race, we kinda work together on it. Stupid is
what stupid does. Oh, and yes, you are evil.
Casual Observer on March 11, 2007 at 08:36
Girls are not evil because its opposite day
Will on March 16, 2007 at 07:16
actually...Will.... if it were opposite day then the opposite of that
is not opposite day and it ends there. The answer to this
mathematical expression is not girls are evil but there are evil girls
is not opposite day and it ends there. The answer to this
mathematical expression is not girls are evil but there are evil girls
Austin on March 16, 2007 at 07:22
ur all dumb srsly i hate you guys, itz a joke. deal.
piss on March 16, 2007 at 07:47
this is a freakin joke, I can't believe there are some guys here
coming up with other equations and more formulas trying to prove or
disprove it. You guys = Virgins Hence you think girls are
evil. Losers.
coming up with other equations and more formulas trying to prove or
disprove it. You guys = Virgins Hence you think girls are
evil. Losers.
Jeff Kee on March 18, 2007 at 07:23
yeah girls are the root of all evil... sorry guys but you have no
choice but to fall to our mercy... good luck (p.s i have a friend who
is going to be an evil dictator. START KISSING UP NOW!!!!)
choice but to fall to our mercy... good luck (p.s i have a friend who
is going to be an evil dictator. START KISSING UP NOW!!!!)
Mellissa on March 24, 2007 at 06:24
i cut myself
emo on March 28, 2007 at 01:23
nice
Alex on March 30, 2007 at 09:38
thank god we dont need woman
mark on April 08, 2007 at 08:03
Wow some folks take this waaaay to seriously. It's just a funny math
joke. That being said, as far as for a relationship of girls =
(time + money) or girls = (time x money), I say girls = (time x money)
works fine most often, and it makes the joke work. In my experience
with women :), the more money you spend, the less time it takes
(hehe), and vice versa. So there does seem to be a inversely
proportional relationship rather than an additive relationship.
While it's not true always, more often than not it will be more
accurately stated to use time x money instead of just time + money,
depending on how much money you are willing to spend and how much time
you are willing to take to spend that money. You could of course
get into that most unlucky situation of girls = (time_1)(money_1) +
(time_2)(money_2) ... in which case it just sucks to be you, and the
longer it drags out the harder it will be to tell if your result more
closely followed time x money or the time + money method. I think
that all works, it's been a long time since I have done much
mathematic thinking.
joke. That being said, as far as for a relationship of girls =
(time + money) or girls = (time x money), I say girls = (time x money)
works fine most often, and it makes the joke work. In my experience
with women :), the more money you spend, the less time it takes
(hehe), and vice versa. So there does seem to be a inversely
proportional relationship rather than an additive relationship.
While it's not true always, more often than not it will be more
accurately stated to use time x money instead of just time + money,
depending on how much money you are willing to spend and how much time
you are willing to take to spend that money. You could of course
get into that most unlucky situation of girls = (time_1)(money_1) +
(time_2)(money_2) ... in which case it just sucks to be you, and the
longer it drags out the harder it will be to tell if your result more
closely followed time x money or the time + money method. I think
that all works, it's been a long time since I have done much
mathematic thinking.
b man on April 11, 2007 at 09:05
Yea w3e might be evil..but if thats what u think then sorry about your
GOD DAMN LUCK!!!...LOL
GOD DAMN LUCK!!!...LOL
Veronica on April 20, 2007 at 11:42
i agree with babboon. girls = time + money. why would you multiply
them? but i still got a kick out of the whole joke thing. =]
them? but i still got a kick out of the whole joke thing. =]
Hannah on April 20, 2007 at 04:23
Okay, I see your point, girls are evil. But money is supposed to equal
to sqrt(all evil), therefore, girls are more likely to be all
evil. *evil laughter*
to sqrt(all evil), therefore, girls are more likely to be all
evil. *evil laughter*
Amy on April 20, 2007 at 11:49
Grils are evil... many guys die and fight for girls. Guys will do
almost everything for a girl... wars in the pass have girls
involvement... but what feeds the evil is guys' needs... they fight,
kill, wage wars because they want it... and me being a guy who does
not deny the true nature of men, must say we are the fools of
evil/girl... but still i love the joke...
almost everything for a girl... wars in the pass have girls
involvement... but what feeds the evil is guys' needs... they fight,
kill, wage wars because they want it... and me being a guy who does
not deny the true nature of men, must say we are the fools of
evil/girl... but still i love the joke...
Dudeman on April 27, 2007 at 11:09
but you don't know what to do without us!mislim stvarno-pozz svima iz
hrvatske!!
hrvatske!!
me on April 28, 2007 at 06:09
Girls are Fucking EVIL! ! !
Gilford on May 03, 2007 at 11:49
for all those noobs who make idiot comments like "no you're wrong,
it's time + money": it must be a product because in your way, you can
make one of the two drop to zero (like no money or no time) and still
get the girl. with a product, if you don't give any money or time, the
product remains no girl, no matter how high the other one is. And
anyway, shut the fuck up, it's just a joke, no more, stop obsessing,
honestly, you all got issues
it's time + money": it must be a product because in your way, you can
make one of the two drop to zero (like no money or no time) and still
get the girl. with a product, if you don't give any money or time, the
product remains no girl, no matter how high the other one is. And
anyway, shut the fuck up, it's just a joke, no more, stop obsessing,
honestly, you all got issues
peter on May 08, 2007 at 02:23
shut the hell up, you motherfucker! what do you mean guys die for
girls? do you know how much girls are hurt by men? look at all the
rape and abuse and beatings given by testosterone filled men. we
girls can't go out at night because there's all those fucked up men
out there wanting to rape us!! so you better shut the hell up girls
have it a lot harder than you think and unless you change your
attitude and give some repect you'll find that no girl likes you and
then wonder why.
girls? do you know how much girls are hurt by men? look at all the
rape and abuse and beatings given by testosterone filled men. we
girls can't go out at night because there's all those fucked up men
out there wanting to rape us!! so you better shut the hell up girls
have it a lot harder than you think and unless you change your
attitude and give some repect you'll find that no girl likes you and
then wonder why.
to dudeman on May 18, 2007 at 04:06
i'm a girl and i love this proof. some people lack the capacity to
comprehend it and thus make fun of it.
comprehend it and thus make fun of it.
invis on June 04, 2007 at 07:52
So, what is your equation for when the woman is the one who spends all
her time and money on the man? And this is a woman willing to admit
that women are crazy, evil and backstabbing.
her time and money on the man? And this is a woman willing to admit
that women are crazy, evil and backstabbing.
Crystal on June 26, 2007 at 01:36
Well, That is my handwriting and I know of three people I wrote that
for, and can only think of one dumb skank who would scan it and post
it on some web site. Amanda Jaress (Living in Texas). I wrote that out
about 9 years ago, as an imporovement to something I saw in a calc
class; and the psycho saved it that long?
for, and can only think of one dumb skank who would scan it and post
it on some web site. Amanda Jaress (Living in Texas). I wrote that out
about 9 years ago, as an imporovement to something I saw in a calc
class; and the psycho saved it that long?
KE on June 29, 2007 at 03:29
honestly not all girls are gold diggers. but alot of girls will agree
with me when i say if you buy us something nice its brownie points for
the bedroom.
with me when i say if you buy us something nice its brownie points for
the bedroom.
Minx on July 19, 2007 at 12:10
well honestly am a girl, but i approve that most of our kind are evil
creatures. i liked the previous comment. True, even if truth hurts.
Well if u like to leave more comments concerning this issue all of u
are invited to share me discussions on www.facebook.com inside the
group Most GIRLS are EVIL!!! Hope to see u there.
creatures. i liked the previous comment. True, even if truth hurts.
Well if u like to leave more comments concerning this issue all of u
are invited to share me discussions on www.facebook.com inside the
group Most GIRLS are EVIL!!! Hope to see u there.
safi on July 20, 2007 at 02:01
it's funny that your math can't prove that girls are evil even though
you want to really bad. You cooked your answer!
you want to really bad. You cooked your answer!
kenya safari travel ideas on September 03, 2007 at 12:26
It's it that the "love of money is the root of all evil" ?
Ethan on September 25, 2007 at 10:13
Now prove that boys are retarded...
Wait, you don't need a proof
for that. It's nontrivial.
for that. It's nontrivial.
Angela on September 25, 2007 at 09:59
@Jim Garrigues
sqrt(x²) is different of [sqrt(x)]²
The first is
the absolute number, but the second is not. For example: if x
the absolute number, but the second is not. For example: if x
Guilherme on October 22, 2007 at 04:05
What this equation proves is that the love of girls is the root of all
evil: all our problems are caused by chasing women. I think that's
very biblical. Don't you? ;-)
evil: all our problems are caused by chasing women. I think that's
very biblical. Don't you? ;-)
James B Ross on October 24, 2007 at 02:54
you guys are evil girls are not evil its the guys that ask us out
VOlley on November 15, 2007 at 06:44
Bravo. If anyone reads all of these posts, it will prove to them that
most of you people are idiots. I'll just make three points. 1. If
you spend time and energy thinking of a way to disprove a JOKE... you
have no life nor a sense of humor. 2. If you say this is just for
nerds who can't get women or virgins... you are an insecure moron who
probably has issues not only with the opposite sex, but also with
yourself. 3. If girls/guys read this and comments how this is
stupid, guys/girls are retards, or guys/girls are actually evil,
manipulative, dangerous people, you've probably had something very
traumatic happen to you to make you feel the way you do, but know
this... those type of human beings are not the norm of all who walk
this Earth. Not all of the opposite sex are parasitic beings that feed
and live on the cruelty and inhumane torments they inflict on the
world. The most important thing to remember if you read all of this
post is that the proof is a joke meant to entertain others, not
actually prove women, girls, ladies, whatever you call females, are
evil.
most of you people are idiots. I'll just make three points. 1. If
you spend time and energy thinking of a way to disprove a JOKE... you
have no life nor a sense of humor. 2. If you say this is just for
nerds who can't get women or virgins... you are an insecure moron who
probably has issues not only with the opposite sex, but also with
yourself. 3. If girls/guys read this and comments how this is
stupid, guys/girls are retards, or guys/girls are actually evil,
manipulative, dangerous people, you've probably had something very
traumatic happen to you to make you feel the way you do, but know
this... those type of human beings are not the norm of all who walk
this Earth. Not all of the opposite sex are parasitic beings that feed
and live on the cruelty and inhumane torments they inflict on the
world. The most important thing to remember if you read all of this
post is that the proof is a joke meant to entertain others, not
actually prove women, girls, ladies, whatever you call females, are
evil.
Ace on November 24, 2007 at 09:06
If going along with the argument that "Girls require time AND money
is an additive statement," then the proof would be as follows:
Girls=Money+Time, Girls=Money+Money Girls=2Money,Girls=2(sqrt Evil).
Now, when following the order of operations, you would find the square
root of "Evil," which was stated above as being "Money," and THEN
multiply that square root by two, which would still take you back to
Girls=2Money...the problem is unsolvable... :) But it was a funny
joke, and trying to add logic to jokes ruins them. Also, some people
do say, "2 and 4 is eight" when multiplying. Being a girl, I quite
agree with the end result of the original proof, lol. JK, but laugh,
have fun, and stop calling each other names...
is an additive statement," then the proof would be as follows:
Girls=Money+Time, Girls=Money+Money Girls=2Money,Girls=2(sqrt Evil).
Now, when following the order of operations, you would find the square
root of "Evil," which was stated above as being "Money," and THEN
multiply that square root by two, which would still take you back to
Girls=2Money...the problem is unsolvable... :) But it was a funny
joke, and trying to add logic to jokes ruins them. Also, some people
do say, "2 and 4 is eight" when multiplying. Being a girl, I quite
agree with the end result of the original proof, lol. JK, but laugh,
have fun, and stop calling each other names...
A Real Girl (Who Might Be Evil) on November 25, 2007 at 09:44
All right and wrong at the same time. Logic "AND" is *, logic "OR" is
+ (search Wikipedia if you don't know). In human terms, + stands for
"and", but sometimes "or" is defined with / or -. Second of all,
when you square a negative number it will become positive, since -3 *
-3 = 9. So both (sqrt(x))² and (sqrt(x²)) are "absolute". It only
doesn't count when X is negative, since you can't square root a
negative number. (³rt(x)) therefor can be negative, since -3 * -3 *
-3 is 27.
+ (search Wikipedia if you don't know). In human terms, + stands for
"and", but sometimes "or" is defined with / or -. Second of all,
when you square a negative number it will become positive, since -3 *
-3 = 9. So both (sqrt(x))² and (sqrt(x²)) are "absolute". It only
doesn't count when X is negative, since you can't square root a
negative number. (³rt(x)) therefor can be negative, since -3 * -3 *
-3 is 27.
Nx on December 23, 2007 at 11:19
"to dudeman"s post-
agreed.
nicole. on December 30, 2007 at 08:41
Hey. This is Rae. I'm posting this to inform you all that the original
author of this joke was a girl, so all you woman out there who might
be hurt by it, this really was just a creative opportunity that arose.
Also, i just wanted 2 say thank you to ace, whoever you are. Out of
all the posts on this website yours was one of the only truly
intelligent opinions which considered all sides of the subject. = )
author of this joke was a girl, so all you woman out there who might
be hurt by it, this really was just a creative opportunity that arose.
Also, i just wanted 2 say thank you to ace, whoever you are. Out of
all the posts on this website yours was one of the only truly
intelligent opinions which considered all sides of the subject. = )
Rachel on January 06, 2008 at 07:53
ok guys, seriosly this was a joke...get it ??? ok no need to get all
pissed and try to prove them wrong...plus we (guys) didnt have girls
wed be miserable..and gay.. so u should go to all the troubl just to
make a stupid math problem about girls...and once agian it was only a
joke get the hell over it
pissed and try to prove them wrong...plus we (guys) didnt have girls
wed be miserable..and gay.. so u should go to all the troubl just to
make a stupid math problem about girls...and once agian it was only a
joke get the hell over it
seriosly on January 14, 2008 at 07:03
boys = desperate to prove anything
mom on January 14, 2008 at 08:51
oh blah, to be technical, what the Bible verse means is that the love
of money is a root of all sorts (ie, many kinds) of evil. Look it up
in a commentary. Anyways, it's a funny joke.
of money is a root of all sorts (ie, many kinds) of evil. Look it up
in a commentary. Anyways, it's a funny joke.
Jeremy on January 18, 2008 at 04:52
the joke says that girls require time and money. Its true. An as for
we guys require girls then it makes us evil too and the real meaning
of the verse is love of money leads to evil not the money it self.
this is a well constructed joke so its pointless to argue the
science behind it
we guys require girls then it makes us evil too and the real meaning
of the verse is love of money leads to evil not the money it self.
this is a well constructed joke so its pointless to argue the
science behind it
Mr Awesome on January 21, 2008 at 03:48
who says you have to multiply money by time? it would make more sense
to add them and that would just fuck it up and girls wouldnt = evil.
so basically this a completely shit ass joke. sorry to ruin it. girls
are still right pain in the arses.
to add them and that would just fuck it up and girls wouldnt = evil.
so basically this a completely shit ass joke. sorry to ruin it. girls
are still right pain in the arses.
GANGSTER G on January 25, 2008 at 09:27
I cannot believe that such a petty argument has been going on for over
2 years!! Incredible. Almost as funny as the original joke.
2 years!! Incredible. Almost as funny as the original joke.
Amazed on January 26, 2008 at 02:09
u r absolutly rite i spend all my time and money behing one girl but
at the end she leave me alone hmmmmm its very difficult now i hate
love no love in this world
at the end she leave me alone hmmmmm its very difficult now i hate
love no love in this world
haider on January 31, 2008 at 01:12
girls = impossible to make happy even with tons of cash being thrown
at them. So i just send them to the kitchen get me a sandwhich and a
beer!
at them. So i just send them to the kitchen get me a sandwhich and a
beer!
elusive on January 31, 2008 at 05:55
omg that is soo offensive
Kristine on January 31, 2008 at 05:59
not only evil but CONFUSING
Ryan€ on February 12, 2008 at 07:06
Haha, very funny.
I am so sick of hearing that girls can only be
won over with money... I admit the cleverness of this joke, but I
don't appreciate the main idea that women are willing to give
themselves away for cash. Sure, some girls do...as do some men,
although less often in relationships than in jobs, etc. The stereotype
is just annoying.
won over with money... I admit the cleverness of this joke, but I
don't appreciate the main idea that women are willing to give
themselves away for cash. Sure, some girls do...as do some men,
although less often in relationships than in jobs, etc. The stereotype
is just annoying.
Myself on February 19, 2008 at 01:33
I, personally, think the joke is hilarious. My friends and I play off
of this to prove guys are pervs. Do we really think so? No. It's just
funny. To kibrab, since he sees fit to insult the female race in
German rather than English: Männer sind Schweine. Alles, was sie
wollen, ist Mädchen mit winzigen Taillen und großen Busen; sie sind
seicht. Und, da es das einzige Ding ist, das zählt, sind sie
schrecklich. Manchmal sind sie, aber nur nett, wenn sie Sie im Bett
wollen
of this to prove guys are pervs. Do we really think so? No. It's just
funny. To kibrab, since he sees fit to insult the female race in
German rather than English: Männer sind Schweine. Alles, was sie
wollen, ist Mädchen mit winzigen Taillen und großen Busen; sie sind
seicht. Und, da es das einzige Ding ist, das zählt, sind sie
schrecklich. Manchmal sind sie, aber nur nett, wenn sie Sie im Bett
wollen
Cris on March 01, 2008 at 07:11
well time is money
have to be time*money, becouse when you don't have
a girl friend she cost no money, therefore it has to be time*money.
a girl friend she cost no money, therefore it has to be time*money.
her on March 04, 2008 at 03:08
yes we r evil and always have sorry that it took you boys all those
years and hard math to finally realise
years and hard math to finally realise
Michaela on March 14, 2008 at 09:14
Wow... GIRLS are evil?
Ha ha. Look in the mirror, guys.
Woman on March 18, 2008 at 09:55
And I thought I had a lot of time on my hands. To actually come up
with a lame equation to prove that "girls are evil" is just sad. Go
get a life. I mean a real one. Honestly, if you spend all of your time
writing about how girls are evil, that only proves one thing; I think
you can guess it.
with a lame equation to prove that "girls are evil" is just sad. Go
get a life. I mean a real one. Honestly, if you spend all of your time
writing about how girls are evil, that only proves one thing; I think
you can guess it.
She on March 18, 2008 at 09:58
Hmmm........ I agree with She.
The fact that we allow you to write
stupid jokes like this is a tribute to our superiority.
stupid jokes like this is a tribute to our superiority.
Girl on March 26, 2008 at 09:33
yes im aware this is a joke, (a really good one in my opinion) so to
add insult to injury to those of you trying to say that it should be
time + money: the more time u spend with them the more money they
require so therefore girls = time x money holds true. muahahahaha
add insult to injury to those of you trying to say that it should be
time + money: the more time u spend with them the more money they
require so therefore girls = time x money holds true. muahahahaha
monkey on March 28, 2008 at 04:24
I like (pretty) girls. I've gone out with like 8 girls and they like
me for who I am. They don't ask for anything, just my time, and that's
cool with me. They are not evil. Besides, who the bloody hell would
bother to do this? What the heck. Whoever did this joke...dude, go out
with a girl and you will see.
me for who I am. They don't ask for anything, just my time, and that's
cool with me. They are not evil. Besides, who the bloody hell would
bother to do this? What the heck. Whoever did this joke...dude, go out
with a girl and you will see.
Marcos on March 28, 2008 at 11:06
yea guyz we evil...BEWARE!!!!!
EVILEST on April 09, 2008 at 10:54
even though woman are evil, its our nature to be attracted to them.
shitbag.
shitbag.
god on April 18, 2008 at 09:07
Shut the fuck up
Nanette on April 20, 2008 at 01:40
the proof works using famous statements. this version is slightly
botched. the first phrase would be "Women are the product of time and
money). that's why you multiply time and money. and to everyone who
says women aren't evil, STFU. it was clearly just proven :P
botched. the first phrase would be "Women are the product of time and
money). that's why you multiply time and money. and to everyone who
says women aren't evil, STFU. it was clearly just proven :P
Thomas on April 24, 2008 at 09:02
Finally maths I enjoy!!!!!
Dayjen on April 26, 2008 at 09:44
lol after reading all these post, its quite apparent there are a lot
of ignorant people out there. But still I havn't laughed this hard in
a long time, haha only on the internet..
of ignorant people out there. But still I havn't laughed this hard in
a long time, haha only on the internet..
AsianAnonymous on May 13, 2008 at 02:20
girls are fat, ugly, money seeking leeches. Ignore them and get
porn. You will become much happier and productive in your daily
life.
porn. You will become much happier and productive in your daily
life.
dude from heaven (lol..) on May 22, 2008 at 01:14
yeah... girls are evil
so why dont you guys just hang up with boys?
there are ALL nice of course~
there are ALL nice of course~
<3 on May 26, 2008 at 02:51
Alright guys... This is meant to be a joke... we have all figurd out
that the term and in this case means addition.. but is a flipping
joke, it doesn't have to make perfect sense... just go with teh flow.
that the term and in this case means addition.. but is a flipping
joke, it doesn't have to make perfect sense... just go with teh flow.
The Foxy Short Bus on May 28, 2008 at 08:47
hehe, yep this equation is so true. Its stuff like this that makes the
world go round
world go round
one cool guy on May 29, 2008 at 12:20
Money is not the root of all evil. The misquote is a common one, but
no more correct for its ubiquity. The actual quote is more along the
lines: "The love of money is the root of all evil"
no more correct for its ubiquity. The actual quote is more along the
lines: "The love of money is the root of all evil"
Sl8ofHand on June 12, 2008 at 11:58
this is confusing.
asdf on June 12, 2008 at 03:04
yeah right...
jocuri masini on June 19, 2008 at 02:53
you know, i totally agree with ace
i spend like several minutes to
finish reading all those replies. people who actually read all this
(no matter what sex) are more amuse reading the comments then towards
the actual joke (the equation) though i have a few remarks to
say 1, chill down. its just a joke, don't even bother to take it
seriously 2, just learn to laugh reading jokes 3, people who post
here are 'amazingly free' (including myself) to the creater of the
equation: i salute you!
finish reading all those replies. people who actually read all this
(no matter what sex) are more amuse reading the comments then towards
the actual joke (the equation) though i have a few remarks to
say 1, chill down. its just a joke, don't even bother to take it
seriously 2, just learn to laugh reading jokes 3, people who post
here are 'amazingly free' (including myself) to the creater of the
equation: i salute you!
amuse on June 22, 2008 at 10:44
.......................
I dont even see why this was created...
Who
came up with this? Its like... a 100% bullshit...
came up with this? Its like... a 100% bullshit...
William on June 24, 2008 at 02:13
no. its like...a 100% fact...
free willy on June 28, 2008 at 10:19
Wow, I remember learning this in Steve Gothmann's class. In fact,
that's the only thing I remember from that class...
that's the only thing I remember from that class...
Zee on June 30, 2008 at 11:58
Comment on first post: the square root of 16 is +4 or -4, because
(+4)^2 = (-4)^2 = 16, so your theory of x always being |y| is
wrong. Jim's statement on the other hand concludes that a squared
number will always be a positive number. This can be viewed as |y|,
because |+4| = 4 = +4... Just to say...
(+4)^2 = (-4)^2 = 16, so your theory of x always being |y| is
wrong. Jim's statement on the other hand concludes that a squared
number will always be a positive number. This can be viewed as |y|,
because |+4| = 4 = +4... Just to say...
Wilzy X on July 11, 2008 at 09:43
lol
very funny
singhisking on July 18, 2008 at 11:17
hahah this is soooo mind blowing... I can't believe people have taken
this soo far. How did it even get to be everywhere like it is
now? For anyone who wants some history on this "mathematical
equation" it was done by a 15-16 year old kid (me) as a form of
flirting. I wrote it at a friends while talking on msn... which she
then posted on her myspace/nexopia/ or msn profile or something which
is where I'm guessing someone copied it and posted it somewhere and
other repeated this cycle
this soo far. How did it even get to be everywhere like it is
now? For anyone who wants some history on this "mathematical
equation" it was done by a 15-16 year old kid (me) as a form of
flirting. I wrote it at a friends while talking on msn... which she
then posted on her myspace/nexopia/ or msn profile or something which
is where I'm guessing someone copied it and posted it somewhere and
other repeated this cycle
Josh Friesen on July 18, 2008 at 11:28
well.when we girls are evil..i think boys are more evil than us
because boys love girls that means boys = girls
boys>girls whahaha lol
because boys love girls that means boys = girls
boys>girls whahaha lol
Gean Marie on July 22, 2008 at 07:36
Wrong. The last step assumes evil is positive. Everyone knows evil is
negative. Therefore the correct equation is that girls are minus evil;
they are totally without it, yay.
negative. Therefore the correct equation is that girls are minus evil;
they are totally without it, yay.
Stephen A. Meigs on July 26, 2008 at 12:49
The real problem is with the first statement - it vastly
oversimplifies the real situation, in which girls are a function of a
large number of factors, many of which are commonly near zero. Of
all the people who have the time and money, only a few have 24/7 hot
and cold running girls. Obviously other factors are involved. We
all know there ARE factors that can substitute for money and time,
(success, fame, drugs) and people who can powerfully factor small
investments of time or money, while others bring large quantities of
both to the table and get nothing but lap dances. Perhaps Time^x
* Money^y * z, where x, y and z are functions of one's personality and
environment rather than merely constants. In addition, with other
values set appropriately, it is possible to prove that Girls=Heaven,
whereas proving that Heaven=Evil is a reductio ad absurdum proof of a
math error. It also seems to be the case that alcohol is completely
absent as a factor in the first equation, and we KNOW this is untrue.
There are definite relationships between girls and alcohol, as well as
alcohol and money, but in neither case are they linear, let alone
equal. Summary: 1. If time and money are both things you are
lacking, you will EXPERIENCE girls as more evil than if you have an
abundance of both. 2. It is possible, though not common, for
other factors to compensate for shortages of both. 3. It is
possible, and common, for small other factors to reduce, though not
nullify, the effects of both being large. The really paradoxical
conclusion: More money is better More time is better More girls are
better Yet - more evil is NOT better. Maybe it's the first term
in a Taylor series?
oversimplifies the real situation, in which girls are a function of a
large number of factors, many of which are commonly near zero. Of
all the people who have the time and money, only a few have 24/7 hot
and cold running girls. Obviously other factors are involved. We
all know there ARE factors that can substitute for money and time,
(success, fame, drugs) and people who can powerfully factor small
investments of time or money, while others bring large quantities of
both to the table and get nothing but lap dances. Perhaps Time^x
* Money^y * z, where x, y and z are functions of one's personality and
environment rather than merely constants. In addition, with other
values set appropriately, it is possible to prove that Girls=Heaven,
whereas proving that Heaven=Evil is a reductio ad absurdum proof of a
math error. It also seems to be the case that alcohol is completely
absent as a factor in the first equation, and we KNOW this is untrue.
There are definite relationships between girls and alcohol, as well as
alcohol and money, but in neither case are they linear, let alone
equal. Summary: 1. If time and money are both things you are
lacking, you will EXPERIENCE girls as more evil than if you have an
abundance of both. 2. It is possible, though not common, for
other factors to compensate for shortages of both. 3. It is
possible, and common, for small other factors to reduce, though not
nullify, the effects of both being large. The really paradoxical
conclusion: More money is better More time is better More girls are
better Yet - more evil is NOT better. Maybe it's the first term
in a Taylor series?
Chainsaw on August 07, 2008 at 09:05
First we state that teachers require time and
learning TEACHERS=TIME+LEARNING And we all know learning is
boreing LEARNING=BOREINGNESS Therefor TEACHERS=TIME+BOREINGNESS an
d boreingness is time so it cancels itself out and it comes
to TEACHERS=TIME we already know that "Time is money"
so TEACHERS=MONEY and we know that"money is the root of all evil"
so TEACHERS=EVIL!
learning TEACHERS=TIME+LEARNING And we all know learning is
boreing LEARNING=BOREINGNESS Therefor TEACHERS=TIME+BOREINGNESS an
d boreingness is time so it cancels itself out and it comes
to TEACHERS=TIME we already know that "Time is money"
so TEACHERS=MONEY and we know that"money is the root of all evil"
so TEACHERS=EVIL!
Kevin Campbell on August 12, 2008 at 08:13
'i think boys are more evil than us
because boys love girls that
means boys = girls..' umm normal boys don't shit test boys. the
ones that do are either gay or closet gay
means boys = girls..' umm normal boys don't shit test boys. the
ones that do are either gay or closet gay
and that tha truth on August 19, 2008 at 08:37
My head hurts.
Thanks a lot.
Madison. Because girls really are evil. on January 02, 2009 at 01:05
:D
Boob on January 03, 2009 at 11:56
This proof is lawlcorrect.
Jerald on January 13, 2009 at 02:54
haha,it is so cool
seavon on January 14, 2009 at 01:46
Excluding coefficients of correlation to real world application (ref
chainsaw) the original proof was missing the second solution in a
quadratic equation when Girl=money*money also Girl=(-money)*(-money).
So girl=(money)^2 or (-money)^2 thus girl=[SQRT(evil)]^2 or
girl=[sqrt(-evil)]=> girl={i*[sqrt(evil)]}^2 being the imaginary root
of all evil. Now girl=evil and (-evil). Both solutions cancel out
leaving girl=0. QED Girls are nothing. The true goal is
sex=(girl+money)*power/time. t->inf no sex
chainsaw) the original proof was missing the second solution in a
quadratic equation when Girl=money*money also Girl=(-money)*(-money).
So girl=(money)^2 or (-money)^2 thus girl=[SQRT(evil)]^2 or
girl=[sqrt(-evil)]=> girl={i*[sqrt(evil)]}^2 being the imaginary root
of all evil. Now girl=evil and (-evil). Both solutions cancel out
leaving girl=0. QED Girls are nothing. The true goal is
sex=(girl+money)*power/time. t->inf no sex
teqrick on January 14, 2009 at 10:18
So much for people with a sense of humor, freedom of speech in the
USA is just showing a lot of people how ignorant we really are...I
mean really picking apart a joke...geez...chill out already. BTW I
like the joke and am for freedom of speech too...just wish some folks
would lighten up a little...or a lot...
USA is just showing a lot of people how ignorant we really are...I
mean really picking apart a joke...geez...chill out already. BTW I
like the joke and am for freedom of speech too...just wish some folks
would lighten up a little...or a lot...
fenderguy on January 19, 2009 at 10:40
Someone asked for a proof that TEACHERS ARE EVIL:
Teachers require
assignments and a salary (through tuition... thinking post-secondary
here) teachers = assignments x salary since assignments take
time and a salary is money: assignments = time salary =
money teachers = time x money and the proof continues similar to
girls from there... time = money teachers = (money)^2 money =
sqrt(all evil) teachers = [sqrt(all evil)]^2 teachers = all
evil therefore, teachers are evil
assignments and a salary (through tuition... thinking post-secondary
here) teachers = assignments x salary since assignments take
time and a salary is money: assignments = time salary =
money teachers = time x money and the proof continues similar to
girls from there... time = money teachers = (money)^2 money =
sqrt(all evil) teachers = [sqrt(all evil)]^2 teachers = all
evil therefore, teachers are evil
Cameron on January 23, 2009 at 10:35
Opinions are like arseholes, everyones got one. =)
Darren on February 15, 2009 at 02:41
I though Girls=time + money
so Girls = 2(money)
so we're not
evil...??
evil...??
JayJay on February 19, 2009 at 02:58
Why worry about women being evil. Pay for the pussy, say thanks and
move on to the next whore; why buy the whole cow when you can just buy
the milk
move on to the next whore; why buy the whole cow when you can just buy
the milk
badup on March 06, 2009 at 11:02
The best (funniest) counter-proof is to refute the first assumption,
"Girls are a product of time and money." Time is a rational number and
money is a rational number. The product of two rational numbers will
always be a rational number. Since we know that girls are irrational,
they can't be a product of time and money.
"Girls are a product of time and money." Time is a rational number and
money is a rational number. The product of two rational numbers will
always be a rational number. Since we know that girls are irrational,
they can't be a product of time and money.
sde on March 11, 2009 at 10:20
What is the mathematical symbol for BITCH?
Because once you get
that one, and possibly a third that is lurking out there, the
Unified Theory of the female will be solved!!
that one, and possibly a third that is lurking out there, the
Unified Theory of the female will be solved!!
Pooman on March 12, 2009 at 02:26
Men are evil! no equation necessary.
AGirl on March 26, 2009 at 02:04
There is one problem that occurs in copying down given information.
You correctly state that money is the root of all evil (given), but
write down: money= sqr rt. of evil. It should be money= sqr rt. of all
evil. Therefore, girls = all evil. Note: "girls are all evil" is not
the same as "all girls are evil". It means that a group of girls,
varying in size, account for all the evil in the world. This
conclusion is very different from his proposed thesis, stating girls
are evil.
You correctly state that money is the root of all evil (given), but
write down: money= sqr rt. of evil. It should be money= sqr rt. of all
evil. Therefore, girls = all evil. Note: "girls are all evil" is not
the same as "all girls are evil". It means that a group of girls,
varying in size, account for all the evil in the world. This
conclusion is very different from his proposed thesis, stating girls
are evil.
Daniel on April 01, 2009 at 02:56
most of wat peepol hav written down is eactly the same, it wastes all
the space on the web page, if its already written, dont write it.
the space on the web page, if its already written, dont write it.
Sven on April 14, 2009 at 01:06
Dorks.
x on April 23, 2009 at 02:11
haha i dont like it its mean but funny and true and guys dont be jerks
then you'll never get a girl lol
then you'll never get a girl lol
nae on April 30, 2009 at 08:40
I don't think people with this kind of grammar deserve modern
technology. If you can't bother to spell out words or use correct
punctuation you really shouldn't be talking at all. Anyways, I love
this joke.
technology. If you can't bother to spell out words or use correct
punctuation you really shouldn't be talking at all. Anyways, I love
this joke.
Random Guy on April 30, 2009 at 07:40
how could you fit the fact that girls are made of sugar and spice and
all things nice into this equation? would fluctuating commodity
prices somehow negate or increase the evil? is this why we offer
chocolates to girls? instinctively trying to balance the equation? ;)
all things nice into this equation? would fluctuating commodity
prices somehow negate or increase the evil? is this why we offer
chocolates to girls? instinctively trying to balance the equation? ;)
gotallmytea on May 03, 2009 at 01:25
student
gopal on May 08, 2009 at 12:38
When u say
girls = (sqrt(Evil))^2
there are two values -> Evil
and -Evil therefore, if girls=(sqrt(evil))^2 Some girls are
evil, some are noy
and -Evil therefore, if girls=(sqrt(evil))^2 Some girls are
evil, some are noy
Wrong on June 06, 2009 at 11:20
well actually, as a reply to "girls=time + money, not time x money":
as time goes on you would have spent more and more on them, for
example, one week you spend some money, next week you buy her
something you would've spent even more money on her; so it's a certain
amount of money you spend, multiplied by how long you buy her stuff.
PWND! =P
as time goes on you would have spent more and more on them, for
example, one week you spend some money, next week you buy her
something you would've spent even more money on her; so it's a certain
amount of money you spend, multiplied by how long you buy her stuff.
PWND! =P
Right on June 07, 2009 at 01:57
it's not even close to a joke. I think the major pain isn't this, it's
them bitching about these two things constantly that drives you nuts
eventually. and I believe girls are evil because we thought
they're not at the first place. Period. The school should teach that
at very early age so that man can take this for granted. If you
are strong, live alone, if you are stronger, live with girls.
them bitching about these two things constantly that drives you nuts
eventually. and I believe girls are evil because we thought
they're not at the first place. Period. The school should teach that
at very early age so that man can take this for granted. If you
are strong, live alone, if you are stronger, live with girls.
Fang Jin on June 10, 2009 at 11:07
ryt, for all the nerds in ere, ITS JUST A BLOODY JOKE SO SHUT UP WITH
TRYING TO DISPROVE IT. an to all the over people, leave the nerds
alone, it keeps them occupied.
TRYING TO DISPROVE IT. an to all the over people, leave the nerds
alone, it keeps them occupied.
wolfy on June 13, 2009 at 11:03
um..fang..living with girls make you stronger?? excuse me, but getting
fat, near blind, and bald does not make one strong
fat, near blind, and bald does not make one strong
fung jun on June 13, 2009 at 03:53
I've been trying to read all these comments, and the only conclusion I
can reach is: /facepalm
can reach is: /facepalm
Tom on June 15, 2009 at 04:02

(sqrt(y))^2 ==> x=|y|. This is not the case. If we had x= sqrt(y^2),
then ==> x=|y|. Therefore, the original joke holds true and it is
incorrect to add the "absolute" evil to the joke.